<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: God, Science, and Natural Evil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rustyparts.com/wp/2005/11/16/god-science-and-natural-evil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rustyparts.com/wp/2005/11/16/god-science-and-natural-evil/</link>
	<description>: Blogging Linear Interstellar Points :</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:34:38 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Camassia &#187; Am not I a fly like thee? Or art not thou a blogwatch like me?</title>
		<link>http://www.rustyparts.com/wp/2005/11/16/god-science-and-natural-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-1566</link>
		<dc:creator>Camassia &#187; Am not I a fly like thee? Or art not thou a blogwatch like me?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 23:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rustyparts.com/wp/2005/11/16/god-science-and-natural-evil/#comment-1566</guid>
		<description>[...] A while ago some of us gave Jason Rust a hard time about an essay he did for Telford on the problem of natural evil. Now he&#8217;s having another go at it, in a paper that incorporates some of our criticisms. The new essay, like all theodicy, just has to fudge some stuff, but I like it better than the previous one. (And the idea that God created a &#8216;becoming&#8217; universe seems to fit better the eschatological direction of the Bible.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A while ago some of us gave Jason Rust a hard time about an essay he did for Telford on the problem of natural evil. Now he&#8217;s having another go at it, in a paper that incorporates some of our criticisms. The new essay, like all theodicy, just has to fudge some stuff, but I like it better than the previous one. (And the idea that God created a &#8216;becoming&#8217; universe seems to fit better the eschatological direction of the Bible.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
