blip

blip : Blog of Isaac & Jason :

Zombie apocalypse and vampire economics

July 21st, 2012 by isaac · 3 Comments

Vampire Economics and the Zombie Apocalypse
Amos 7:7-15, Mk 6:14-29, Ps 85
by
Isaac S. Villegas
July 15, 2012


“Steadfast love and faithfulness will meet; justice and peace will kiss” (Ps 85:10). This beautiful line describes the world of the Psalmist — a world where “God’s glory will dwell in our land” (v. 9), where “the Lord will give what is good” (v. 12), where “our land will yield its increase” (v. 12), where “faithfulness will spring up from the ground” (v. 11), where “justice will look down from the sky” (v. 11). All of this, the Psalmist says, is what salvation looks like: “Surely God’s salvation is at hand for those who fear him” (v. 9). Salvation is reaching out to us, as God fills dismantles the world of sinful systems that have eaten away at God’s order. For the Psalmist, we live in a world where salvation is at our fingertips, surrounding us. Everything is in its right place, according to the Psalmist: justice and peace and goodness are as natural as the rain that falls from the sky and the plants that grow from the ground.

I want to live in that world, but the way things are right now feels more like the story we heard from the Gospel of Mark where John the Baptist gets his head cut off because of a seductive dance and too much wine. Herod, in the story, is part of the 1%, a member of the class of people who feast while others struggle to make it to the next paycheck. He throws a party for “his courtiers and officers and the leaders of Galilee” (Mk 6:21). The rich and powerful eat more than they need and drink from bottomless glasses. That evening, after everyone had more than enough to drink, Herod and his friends enjoy the entertainment of Herodias’ daughter. The text says that she pleased the men (v. 22); and when it says that they were “pleased,” it wouldn’t be inappropriate for us to hear sexual overtones, because that’s how the word sounds in Greek.

In the midst of all this indulgence, Herod has John the Baptist executed, his head brought into the party for all to see, on a serving dish, ready to be eaten. His life was sacrificed for the party, collateral damage for a way of life driven by insatiable appetites, rash decisions.

This is an image of our world — a world where the rich and powerful enjoy the pleasures of life, even as they life off of systems that feed on the lives of others, the lives of people who live from paycheck to paycheck, trying to pay the bills and buy groceries and keep the creditors happy and pay the rent. Our economics has created a system that enslaves people through debt — we kill ourselves working because we owe so much money, and that debt keeps on growing because of interest rates that compound. We shouldn’t forget that the economics of this country was founded upon slave labor, and there is something of that old way of treating people that has stuck around in the DNA of our economy. For example, last week Wells Fargo got it trouble with the feds when it was discovered that they have been signing up black and brown people for loans at higher interest rates, even though they qualified for lower rates. In other words, without supervision, the mortgage system thinks that there is nothing wrong with enslaving the working lives of racial minorities with more debt than white people, debt which funds a financial system that makes possible off-shore investment accounts for the wealthy. Since 2008 — the beginning of our current recession — the millionaires of the world have increased their net worth. They have made money off of the financial devastation of others; they make money off of people who are enslaved by debt.

It’s no wonder that, as a culture, we are fixated on vampires and zombies, creatures that live as parasites. That’s what we have become, through our economic institutions. We’ve created institutions that sustain themselves by sucking the life out of others. In the 18th century, as he watched the powerful take over shape of economics, Voltaire talked about vampires. In the entry on vampires in The Philosophical Dictionary, he retold stories of corpses “who went out of their graves at night to suck the blood of the living.” These vampires “grew fat, got rosy, and enjoyed an excellent appetite.” While walking in the financial capitals of Europe, Voltaire used the image of the vampire to describe the corruption of the bankers and the emerging finance industry:

“We have never heard a word of vampires in London, or even at Paris. I confess that in both these cities there were sock-jobbers, brokers, and men of business, who sucked the blood of the people in broad daylight; but they were not dead, though corrupted. These true suckers lived not in cemeteries, but in very agreeable palaces.”

We live in this parasitic system, where the wealth of the many is redistributed to the minority of powerful elite, economic vampires who dwell in modern palaces by sucking money from the working lives of others. In his recent book, Monsters of the Market: Zombies, Vampires, and Global Capitalism, David McNally investigates the fixation of our modern imagination on undead monsters, specifically vampires and zombies. The two come together, as “linked poles of the split society.” At one pole, we have vampires, “dreaded beings who might possess us and turn us into their docile servants.” At the other pole, are people who fear becoming zombies, “lifeless, disempowered agents of alien powers.”

We fear the vampires, those who suck the life out of us, who possess and live though us, rendering us servants to their systems. And, as McNally notes, we fear that we are becoming zombies, going to our jobs as if we were the living dead: subject to alien economic powers, forces beyond our control, the flows of finance that insinuate their way into our work, the economic institutions that enslave us through the work of our hands, as we deposit paychecks, use our credit cards, and repay our growing debts.

If McNally is right to link our fascination with monsters to our economic condition, then it makes sense that a fear of zombies quickly spread through the United States last month. Rumors of a “Zombie Apocalypse” captured our popular imagination. After news about several cases of cannibalism turned into a panic about zombies infiltrating our cities, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), issued a statement to calm the growing alarm: “The CDC does not know of a virus or condition that would reanimate the dead (or one that would present zombie-like symptoms.)”

As the rich gain more and more wealth from the working poor during the current economic recession, the masses worry that we are on the verge of becoming a society of zombies. Perhaps, as McNally suggests, the fear of zombies is related to the subconscious realization that our working lives are under the control of foreign powers, of financial markets, and that we have become zombie-like creatures, in a state of living death, never quite able to escape the slavery of our debts — the same debts that allow the wealthy to live like vampires, to party like Herod, and offer prisoners as necessary sacrifices to sustain the system.

This is the kind of world that the prophet Amos condemns. “They sell the righteous for silver,” Amos prophecies, “and the needy for a pair of sandals — they who trample the head of the poor into the dust of the earth,” (Amos 2:6-7). “Hear this word, you cows of Bashan… who oppress the poor, who crush the needy” (4:1). You “abhor the one who speaks the truth… you trample the poor and take from them levies of grain… [Therefore,] you have built houses of hewn stone, but you shall not live in them; you have planted pleasant vineyards, but you shall not drink their wine” (5:10-11).

Amos offers a harsh word from God to a people who maintain a society where the rich get richer and the poor are crushed at the bottom, crushed with inhumane labor, and crushed under the weight of poverty.

“Woe to those who lie on beds of ivory, and lounge on their couches, and eat lambs from the flock, and calves from the stall; who sing idle songs to the sound of the harp… who drink wine from bowls, and anoint themselves with the finest oils… they shall now be the first to go into exile, and the revelry of the loungers shall pass away” (6:4-7).

The people who lounge in luxury, Amos notes, end up using religion as a form of self-absolution. They can continue to benefit from unequal systems of labor and property because they have convinced themselves that God is happy about the way things are. But God will not participate in their worship:
“I hate, I despise your festivals, and I take no delight in your solemn assemblies. Even though you offer me your burnt offerings and grain offerings, I will not accept them; and the offerings of well-being of your fatted animals I will not look upon. Take away from me the noise of your songs; I will not listen to the melody of your harps.” (5:21-23)

Yet, after such a harsh word, God doesn’t leave the people in condemnation. Instead of using faith to make themselves feel good about an economically unjust world, God offers a vision of restoration: “But let justice roll down like waters, and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream” (v. 24).

Justice flowing like the rivers — this returns us to the world of Psalm 85, where “justice and peace will kiss,” where “faithfulness will spring up from the ground,” and where “justice will look down from the sky.”

According to the God of Amos, such a world is possible, in which resources would be redistributed for the sake of the poor instead of for the wealthy. This was also the vision at the heart of one of Woodie Guthrie’s songs. If he was still alive, he would have been 100 years old last week. He wrote “This Land Is Your Land” as a patriotic protest against the shallow sentimentalism of another song his fellow citizens were singing, “God Bless America.” In response, Guthrie sang,

“There was a big high wall there that tried to stop me/ Sign was painted, it said private property / But on the back side it didn’t say nothing/ This land was made for you and me… / In the squares of the city, in the shadow of a steeple / By the relief office, I’d seen my people. / As they stood there hungry, I stood there asking / Is this land made for you and me?”

Although he’s been dead for some time now, Woody Guthrie’s question still haunts us, “Is this land made for you and me?” In this world populated by the living dead, people crushed under poverty and the weight of debt, the prophetic words of Amos and Guthrie call our global economy into question. With the financial health of world markets in a state of collapse, we should be hoping for Christ’s return, for the day of the Lord, when all things will be restored. But, Amos’ prophecy exposes what my hope tries to hide: that God’s salvation will undo the systems of this world that sustain my life. “Woe to you who long for the day of the Lord,” Amos writes. “Why do you want the day of the Lord? It is darkness, not light… Is not the day of the Lord darkness, not light, and gloom with no brightness in it?” (Amos 5:18, 20).

To hope for the day of the Lord, to hope for salvation, is to open ourselves up to judgment, to open ourselves to wonder if we are on God’s side.

Tags: sermons

3 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Bill // Jul 23, 2012 at 4:42 am

    Jesus asked the rich young ruler to give away all he owned. When the 1 percenter refused, Jesus did not ask a centurion to force him to give this up. Such an action would be immoral and would miss the point of Christ’s request. Americans as a whole give a greater percentage of their income to charity than pretty any nation in history. As Christians, we are to help the poor, but we are not to help the poor by stealing from the rich. Let your wealthy brother give as his conscience demands . Forcing him to give or envying his wealth is evil.

  • 2 Al // Aug 4, 2012 at 2:06 am

    Maybe I should be less concerned with how the “vampires” redistribute the wealth of society, and be more concerned with how I distribute my own.

  • 3 isaac // Sep 8, 2012 at 11:04 am

    or you could worry about both.